|
Genetic
Engineering (Pharm animals)
Genetic Engineering is a further way to exploit and abuse animals.
This "new" way allows scientists to alter animals genetic make-up and
even mix genetic material between species. What started out in the early
80s as a few tentative experiments has now exploded into a highly contentious
free-for-all.
The transgenic animals are not only confined to the laboratory but
they are being "created" with grotesque deformities. The major thrust
of this work is aimed at creating tailor-made animals for research,
engineering them to produce medical substances, and "improving" creatures
for eating.
Joyce D'Silva, director of Compassion in World Farming has said, "I
think {scientists} started out optimistic that they'd get faster growing
super-animals, then they found out that they were often deformed and
suffered greatly – surprise, surprise." As in the case of money,
it is not difficult to see why this should happen.
There have been attempts to produce grazing pigs, pigs which produce
appealing milk, and muscular chickens containing calf genes. More "successful"
scientists have created turkeys which produce more eggs, and sheep containing
mouse genes have been created to grow more wool. As for fish engineering,
there are GE fish on sale and also there is plenty of work being done
on them behind the scenes. Their main aim is create GE mega-fish which
grow larger and faster. They have also tried putting flounder genes
inside salmon to help them tolerate cold better and become disease resistant.
There are several noticeable risks associated with fish engineering.
Changes in size and breeding patterns could effect all other creatures
which feed on that fish, GE fish could displace other varieties hence
further reducing the natural gene pool, and escapes from fish farms
are so common now that in parts of Norway escaped fish outnumber wild
ones at a ratio of 5:1. What else? Another risk that grows out of genetic
engineering replicates is this tendency toward creation of genetic uniformity,
the emergence of harmful recessives, and, of course, the greater susceptibility
of organisms to devastation by pathogens, as has been shown to be the
case in crops.
A further category of risks is environmental and ecological and is
a direct result from "pharming" animals. The risk is associated with
releasing GE animals into the environment, but with negative, unanticipated
consequences. What animals have been released into the environment?
Predator insects have been "designed" to perform biological pest control
by preying on noxious insects . The more any organism differs from its
parent stock, the more difficult it will be to predict its effect on
the environment. Genetic engineers invariably work in the dark and virtually
nothing is known about how genes integrate into chromosomes. If you
disbelieve us, we only need to cite intensive farming practice techniques
to show how far removed we are, as a species, from understanding the
unique symbiosis that exists between Nature and her inhabitants.
For example, with GE practices one faulty action will compound several
others creating a chain reaction that was not imagined at the initial
point of departure. If an animal such as a GE predator insect is too
"successful" at what he does then this could cause crowding out of other
species, plants and animals, that one did not wish to affect. Similarly,
"new" animals could start displaying traits in an environment setting
that were not evident in the laboratory or other "controlled" situations.
Consequently, each transgenic animal is unique and may express entirely
different characteristics than first thought. Because of this lack of
control, mutants may be produced.
There is also the question of "wastage" of pharm animals who didn't
make the grade. Multi-national companies working with transgenic animals
would like to recoup some of their costs by selling them for meat. It
is already happening in Australia.
Compassion in World Farming has said:
"Of the 50,000 -100,000 genes in farm animals, we know the
identity and function of only 1-2 per cent. Making modifications to
this genome is like playing with a chemistry set which has had all the
labels removed. Except that in the case of gene transfer, the experimental
materials are living, sentient creatures, capable of feeling the pain
that is caused when the experiments inevitably go wrong."
How insulting it is that these "smart" scientists now call these defenseless,
disposable animals in their care "pharm" animals. It is too late to
ask what it is that could possibility be a limiting factor to these
people. Preserving the identity and autonomous integrity of the animal
perhaps? That has already been violated. Morality perhaps? Ethics? A
sense of decent boundaries? Now that this work has began it is disquieting
to realise that there is no limiting factor as it is aggressively encouraged
and even funded by governments, including our own.
Scientists do little to educate the public about moral interests for
two reasons. Most scientists are trained to ignore moral issues and
secondly it is not in their best interest to warrant public scrutiny
over their laboratory, behind-closed-doors practices.
The good news is unlike vivisection, if GE "fails", if there are any
catastrophic outcomes of GE (especially of humans) then this is likely
to eventuate in the imposition of severe restrictions on both research
and its practical applications and in wholesale public rejection of
biotechnology. Our choice as consumers, also, is not limited to collaboration
or subjugation. We cannot blindly hope that a wiser council will prevail.
Taxpayers have a right to know the truth, and not to be bamboozled with
government and "industry" propaganda. The best thing we can do is lobby
government and consciously avoid buying any products from a company
which uses GE techniques in their manufacturing – don't forget
to write and tell that Company what you are doing. If money really does
talk then they will soon get the message.
Go to top of page
Likely Areas
of Manipulation
- Increasing the levels and types of nutrients in animal feeds.
- Increasing animal growth and food production.
- Improving animal health.
- Embryo multiplication: for example., the rapid multiplication of
"superior" animals.
- Transgenesis: transferring desirable traits from one animal species
to another.
Go to top of page
Professor John Webster, of Bristol University,
predicts that animals will be manipulated in a further six areas:
- Altering an animal's digestion to increase nutrient availability.
- Manipulation of an animal's metabolism to increase the production
of milk, meat and wool.
- Increasing the productive rate in females.
- Manipulation of animal consciousness.
- Insertion of human genes to make animas produce pharmaceuticals.
- Insertion of human genes into animals so that they can serve as
organ donors.
Go to top of page
Myths Concerning
GE
- GE reduces the cost of food.
- GE food increases consumer choice
- Normal crops and GE crops must be mixed at harvest.
- Nobody would ever put viruses into our food.
- We have the best regulations in the world.
- Just injecting cows with GE hormones can't hurt.
- Milk from cows injected with BST is just like any other milk.
- They can now engineer perfect drugs from micro-organisms.
- There is no danger anyone will clone a human being.
- You own your body.
- Soon human organ donors won't be needed, they will get organs from
animals.
- If genes couldn't be patented it would hamper research.
- Terminator technology will never be used.
- Anything new is always progress.
Go to top of page
Quotes
"Biotech companies are not behaving responsibly, considering the irreversible
nature of any accident which may occur. There should be a moratorium
on the introduction of genetic engineering until the science can be
proven to be safe, and we believe that companies with a vested interest
cannot be trusted to to this...."
– Q. Gargen, Genetics Concern, Ireland
"Ninety per cent of people want fair dinkum labels."
– Bob Phelps, Director, Australian GeneEthics Network
"I believe in technology. But it is too new for us to be absolutely
sure of what we are doing."
– Dr A. Pusztai in a press statement
"The geneticist Dr Pusztai is a very dangerous man. He has released
into the environment a virulent self-replicating organism, which is
already running riot across Britain. Its called the truth."
– George Monbiot, Guardian, 1999
"I suggest projects should be vetted by ethical committees comprising
eminent people in various disciplines. Such ethical committees should
be universal."
– Professor Sir J. Rotblat, Nobel Peace-prize winner
"Twelve voices were shouting in anger, and they were all alike. No
question, now, what had happened to the faces of the pigs. The creatures
outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to
man again; but already it was impossible to say which was which."
– George Orwell, Animal Farm
"Mainstream commentators, including bioethicists, are already peddling
the idea of cloning dying children."
– The Council for Responsible Genetics
Go to top of page
|